Crossposted from Flopping Aces

Howard Dean tried to defend their attack ad against John McCain on Fox news this morning and boy did the man look befuddled: (h/t Hot Air)

Around the two and half minute mark Wallace asks “you don’t have any problem with that [distortion]” to which Dean replied “our problem is that McCain is distorting what he [McCain] said.”

Wh-wha-what!

This man is a perfect posterboy for such a pathetic party in disarray.

also:

Obama Soft On Iran?

Is it any wonder Hamas endorses Barack Obama for President? The man is soft as jello:

So, its fine and dandy to invade an ally, ie Pakistan, but if Iran nukes Israel its not fine to attack Iran?

Yes, yes…he doesn’t say he wouldn’t attack Iran. Just that he doesn’t think the rhetoric is a good idea but you know what? When your asked a straightforward question like “what would you do as President if Iran nuked Israel?” its a good thing sometimes to get a straightforward answer….like Hillary gave.

What in the hell is going on in this world when someone comes along that makes Hillary look sensible?

“Why would I have any regrets?” she asked in an exclusive appearance on a special edition of “This Week” from Indianapolis, Ind. “I’m asked a question about what I would do if Iran attacked our ally, a country that many of us have a great deal of, you know, connection with and feeling for, for all kinds of reasons. And, yes, we would have massive retaliation against Iran.

“I don’t think they will do that, but I sure want to make it abundantly clear to them that they would face a tremendous cost if they did such a thing,” she added.

She’s completely wrong on Iraq, on the economy, and in her love for Socialism….but on this she is right. They HAVE to know if they were to do anything stupid we would respond strongly. And not a strongly worded letter like Obama would apparently respond with.

But the fact of the matter is, I don’t believe for one minute Hillary would nuke Iran. Unless the polls tell her to of course.